Pailos lies: The love we will separate 
Federico Matías Pailos lies. It lies between the unwary. In his book "Love is going to separate" d ice things like: "One of the few agreements reached in contemporary philosophy is that the idea of \u200b\u200ba point of view devoid of any personal attachment is a meaningless idea" , which must be false because if Kant makes no sense. And, if I cover with a veil of ignorance, rather the survival of the Nagel Kant or his disciple South America, Federico Matías.
If Matt Federico lie, then it is possible a view devoid of personal circumstances. That, and all this comes the above syllogism is the point of view by the narrator of Fe Auto The problem is who is the narrator.
The narrator is a minor deity, for example, is right in the center of eight times, creating planets that last fourteen years and who exploit the same ingredients for the creation, which is left in the area head of Zeus. One of his creations, we venture, is just the Pailos Matthias. Matthias Pailos on your mobile fetus and baby version rompebolas five times, in each of these scenes, the appearance of baby Pailos is triggering new and unconscionable insult to the father Pailos, is a break in the routine of the housing problem of Buenos Aires in the late 70's. But most important is that each time it appears Pailos baby, the story stops to contemplate what makes him such activities could be formalized in a penta-disjunction:
Or kick in an earthquake or sleep, or fall from the crib or put head between the bars or turn his back on his family. By rule
deductive case, we know that if from the disjuncts of a disjunction is still the same result, we can infer and assert that consequence. What is the result here? That baby Pailos always wanting to escape. Where? I think he wants to escape the story. And he wants to escape the story because the protagonist is not exclusive, because the story not only speaks of him, but also dares to speak of others who are not him, something that the gods can not bear children and masturbatory. Pailos baby trying to escape their story and ends up showing expression of anger in him, as when we want to escape from a house and ended up breaking the lock. If we stop talking
Baby Pailos can say that Fe Auto account the relationship between Papa Pailos and a large group of women who, unlike the double father, seem unable to comprehend the possibility of splitting, of showing otherwise and to use their other names is Santa Pailos wimp but it is also seductive and finally Walter willing to put balls into the situation, Baby Pailos is an angry baby be a baby. The protagonist of the story is, despite the baby escapist Pailos Dad, and he, unlike his eldest son, runs the hero, showing complexities, doubts, bends and end processing in the trip. Federico
If Matt did not tell lies and was at least truthful, would have raised the conflict as appropriate: between father and son. Because, again, what triggers the obscenities against Pailos Dad are escapist actions of the henpecked husband, because the constitutive impossibility of the story to the ambitions of baby Pots and therefore, the reason for their attempts leakage, is that the protagonist is Father Pailos. Both can not coexist on the story and knows Federico Matías. However, it conceals. Wants us to believe that the story is about something else, which is about women with children and repression, which is evidence of Nagel's argument and, indeed, what we should say is this: What is a
view from scratch? No one who does not take into account personal attachments but a point of view that does not take into account the personal aditmentos Pailos Federico Matías. What is impossible and therefore constantly Pailos Baby escapes anywhere, let alone is Pailos Federico Matías.
