Adjust Bike Seat Height Rusted

Statement of Intent

This page is intended as a wake-up call to a serious problem that threatens our land: wildfires. Far from settling a sentence or opinions is a discussion forum where it is considered complete anything, which is assumed to be a very complex problem is not solely to blame, nor is there a single solution.

In the wave of fires that plague every summer, but each winter (Christmas Day there were three active fires in the southwest of Ourense), I consider a fundamental question: Who burned the mountains? Given the passivity of those who should investigate it (Galicia whole is burned and only a handful of cases of convicted arsonists), I need to open a public debate on the causes of fires and their caretakers.

The magnitude of the problem is such that it is clear that behavior is not isolated, pranks, or even less of chance events. When in the same town there are four fires on the same day at the same time (at dusk), can not be a coincidence: there is a plan incendiary.

Galicia, as the North Portugal and bordering regions Asturian, Leonese and Castilian , is suffering from two decades ago in an arson attack that can only be due to economic reasons. It's a real fire industry , with interest groups that benefit from the burning bush, before the consent authorities.

Unraveling who is responsible is not a pleasant task, it necessarily have to hurt feelings (rather than politicians are saved). To take an example : when we point out as possibly responsible for the hunters, it is clear that not all hunters will hit the mountain fire. Moreover, even a majority or a minority. But I think some people doubt that specific interest related to hunting forest fire hit. Generalize it so wrong to blame as the acquittal of an entire group or interest group.

is not the intention of this page to blame anybody, for that is (are?), Judges and prosecutors, but to reflect together on possible interest that can lead to burn the forest every year. It's not about pointing the finger of blame, especially since in my opinion the latter is guilty in the various governments that have been created, by act or omission economic and social conditions that have led to this plague that threatens to destroy , absolute and definitive way, the natural wealth of our land.

is a complex issue that must be addressed from many perspectives, not just the extinction or the police persecution of the direct perpetrators. It is a problem Sociological and economic . By economic interests that exist around the fires. Sociological disaffection of rural Galicia restocking woodlands that came imposed by the dictatorship and even before (the scale reforestation began in the reign of Isabel II), and by the ignorance in which live the urban Galicia problems affecting the Galician mountains.

is therefore a problem to be addressed globally, including in the jurisdictional and geographical aspect. It's easy to assume that shared causes and probablemene, inflammatory agents with other areas devastated by fire in Northwest Peninsular .

Of course, although this page is focused on Mount Galician is of course open to any citizen of the peninsula (I hope the language is not a border to the Portuguese readers), since much of what is said here will be easily transferable to other regions . Nature is one, and unfortunately the fires not only threaten the corner, or stop at the border.

My only intention is to give a alarm at what I think the biggest ecological disaster affecting Galicia, collecting the opinions I hear on the street and from them to open a discussion forum in which to exchange ideas and views.

This is because an invitation to reflection and debate. Nothing here is written is indisputable, everything is contested, debatable. This page offers only a few topics point of a dialogue between citizens. The sequence is the same at all points, interest analysis and suggested solutions that might turn off those interests.

The maximum would be:

Ensure that no one takes advantage of the mountain burn, not burn .

You have now the word.

Coby Surround Sound System Owners Manual

brief history note

three centuries ago, began the systematic logging of the Galician hills. First on the coast, then inland, were developed as means of transport. Atlantic native forest, based in Oak Carballo was replaced by reforestation of cheap fast-growing species, suitable for industry (pinus radiata and eucalyptus globulus ). With this ecological crime to our ecosystem broke people's connection to a mountain and was foreign, and thus sowed the seeds of another problem: wildfires.

Long Term Effects Of Coversyl

-80% of fires occurring in Europe are given in Peninsula Ibérica.

- Galicia has a 7% of English forests, and their level of fire risk is low because it is the wet Spain. However, it suffers 50% of fires, and about 30% of acres affected in Spain.

-Of 153.000Ha that raged in Spain in 2005, 50.000Ha were Galicia, about half of them in the province of Ourense .

-is, 12 times more likely to burn land in the province of Ourense that at any point in Spain.

There -burn land a rate of two to five years . Burning bushes that came out of the previous fire, burning trees just planted reforestation.

"These areas have an incipient process of desertification ..¡¡¡ EN GALICIA!. The increased erosion causes soil infertility often in rock and the highest incidence of floods and droughts.

"There are municipalities that have fire all the days of summer. If one day missing smoke ... is that the next three. Some municipalities in Raia Seca with little or nothing to burn.

"Only a small part of Mount Orense has not suffered a fire in the past 20 years. The predominant vegetation in Ourense are Xestas , UCESA and other species that follow forest degradation and reforestation of pine . It is almost impossible to find a Carballal more than 20 years, the few that remain are juveniles who were born spontaneously after a fire (the regional government has never significant areas reforested with native species).

"Most fires are caused in areas inaccessible to fall later and several outbreaks in the same area or in waves in the same area. Fires are caused by professional , left to develop in the evening to be the following morning and hits, and dividing the mass extinction which must be focus on protecting towns.

"It is noteworthy that recently the stage of fire is not limited to summer, but also in cold, dry days of winter are waves of fire (some days none, some days five in a handkerchief). While the spread is slower, are much more dangerous for deciduous to be in this time with a very low water content, nearly dry, so they are much more vulnerable to the action of the flames.

I think:

Fire there are everywhere, but in the South of Galicia attend special circumstances which distinguish this problem. In other words: HERE is something wrong. There is a differential feito that distinguishes the inhabitants of the northwestern Iberian peninsula remaining.

Source: Ministry of Environment

Updated: Data for year 2006 in Galicia.

No. 6,997 fires =

area burnt = 93,887 of which has over 54,000 ha of forested area were .

Between 1 and 4 August has burned 82,418 , ie 88% of the area burned throughout the year. In four days.

Preliminary findings of the Civil Guard argue that there is no connection between fires .

The concentration of fires in four days in response to a coincidence.

I should have a full moon that day.

May this year to change their type and move from burning forests lost in Ourense and Lugo as every year, threatening the Atlantic axis periurban space Galicia is also another chance.

The moon lit up the same ideas.

I realize that the figures do not give a clear idea of \u200b\u200bthe problem, since it is difficult to imagine what all those acres under. Put it on:

De 148,730 has burned throughout the English territory in 2006, has 93,887 corresponded to Galicia. Ie 63% surface was burned in Spain, was in Galicia. Counting

the Galician forest area is 2,039,575 has last year burned the 4.6%, ie one twentieth of Galician forest.

Arguably Galicia has a long hill, the topic forever. Let's see: Spain has 26 million hectares of forest area. Thus, Galicia represents 7.7% Mount English, and accumulated 63% of the area burned.

The question is obvious:

WHY?

then analyze the causation of forest fires.

Maxine Cartoonson Men

forest Responsible

Under this heading I include those technicians responsible forest management, not because they are suspected of burning anything, but because they are guilty of the terrible state in which the mountain is Galician, and is a direct cause of the fires.

The choice of species, short-cycle species very profitable for the industry but little for the land owner (the wood of young pine, eucalyptus or is dirt cheap even without burning) is and a true ecological crime. Alien species into the half in introducing, impoverish the soil, prevent the development of tree species develop more slowly, creating a monoculture as ecologically rich as a field of grain Castilian.

The criterion of extraction is also an insult to the intelligence, seeing trucks loaded with logs of diameters less than 10cm, and even to 5cm. The procedure for logging wild that takes place in Galicia, by selecting a field and destroying everything, leaving it stripped of all vegetation, the ground split by the machine rolled and exposed to erosion, is a procedure that only has an advantage: the short-term benefit of logging companies, which minimizes costs.

In a third world country the administration should ensure the general interest, and not giving leeway to the barbaric way to proceed. The engineer who approves that knows how to act under any foreman mountains forests centuries ago when a young tree cut was a serious crime (and a folly.)

a timber industry that requires it to grinding for the production of paper pulp and chipboard, only requires fibers, the weight of tiny wood cost can come from both juveniles, and burned.

We in the administration about how utterly foreign to the problem of forest service timber companies and processors and their interests. Galician forests now worthless : Most oak trees are less than twenty years (the product of natural regeneration of forest fires and massive cutting, if not above Carballal been replanted with pines and eucalyptus, thus completing the disaster.) The remaining forests, afforestation, are of a very low cost per copy, as appropriate to the industry but obviously not the owners (who are often communal).

administration can not treat the forest as a matter of marketing, rather than as a unique asset to preserve. The administration has to manage the assets of all in interest, and not exempted from their responsibilities and leave the forest planning in the hands of the forest industry. A well-managed forest is a richness, economic importance, for society and very specifically for the rural community where he resides. If there are strong economic interests in a forest does not burn, the forest does not burn.

Solutions:

• adoption of a rational, modern, forestry, in which logging is selective, only mature specimens and commercially viable, reducing the landscape and ecological impact (soil erosion). With this system, the profits flow back to the land owner. In today's language: to value timber .

• Assumption by management guidelines, a plan showing what you want to do with the mountain. That government decisions have to be aimed at the preservation of biodiversity and the management of forests wisely to have a high value that accrues in the communities to whom they belong. This will begin by know the current status of Mount Galician as a serious, rigorous and oblivious to outside pressure, not like now.
  

• absolute protection of the few unaltered examples of Atlantic forest in Galicia (Ancares, Caurel, Raspberries Eume, Teixedal of Casaio ...) as gems and hope for the future of Galicia. They must be the seed to undo all the devastation of the last decades of barbarity against the mountain.

• That the objective of the planting is restore the ecosystem we inherited, and not serve as a cheap raw material for shredding industries. Absolute prohibition of restocking with any species of eucal IPTO or pine native. Regenerate the Atlantic forest (oak Carballo, oak, holly, beech, negro, birch ...) continued ndo biological criteria and not short-term speculators wood.

Hoyt Smoke Compound Bow

Galicia has a strong forest sector. Burning wood is cheaper because it only serves to grinding, either for manufacturing conglomerates such as to produce pulp. This is the largest productive sector Galician and both industries, the pulp mill and the clusters, the existence of forest fires is their insurance to obtain raw materials at low cost.

Interests:

Getting cheaper raw material purchased the burning wood, causing also a price drop of the green wood, breaking the market.

If we know who are ultimately responsible for the wave of fires affecting Galicia would be that the regional government, which owns the data became public what is the fate of both truck burned wood, to which companies are going and Price was acquired.

would also be interesting to know how to integrate the burnt wood in the production cycle, if necessary, the use of bleaching (chlorine derivatives) for its use, and ultimately a study in depth (independent) on the proportion wood burned in these processes and the profitability obtained when using it.

The huge jaws of the lumber industry swallow big mouthfuls of forest a day. Galicia can not be the pantry of these monsters of cellulose, which dictate the management and operation of the Galician mountains at your convenience. The richness of these companies is the poverty of rural areas fleece.

Solutions:

• The logging a tree is an ecological damage must be minimized and, where possible, repaired. To this should be a tax special like the one that weighs on oil, which is attributable cubic meter wood. Small impact on the furniture industry, which uses high-cost wood and in which it would dilute this sopreprecio, but costly for the industries of paper and chipboard, which use large amounts of cheap wood , and would have an impact on the consumer, thereby curbing irresponsible alcohol consumption. This tax would cover the repopulation of the Galician hills.

• in step with rising paper prices, articulate an awareness campaign on the rational use this well, preventing misuse as mass print advertising, which do not involve promoting deforestation (telemática. ..).

• Ban all trade in wood smoke . This would require at first cut green wood in place, but it is the conditio sine qua non just rowing with forest fires. The trees in a burned forest should be killed and crushed in situ to fertilize the land and proceed to ....

• automatic restocking burnt mountain. That management has an obligation by law short-term repopulating a whole area to be burned, following guidelines for this environmental diversity and regeneration of Atlantic forest. Afforestation will be paid by the various administrations, municipalities also currently profit from the sale of wood burned. Thus, a municipality with high rates of fire will not win more investment, but have to replace what was unable to protect its inefficiency. We must end the current situation, in which municipalities are following a fire that spread among the families of people a good amount, where few houses and lots of the affected area can reach a considerable amount (bread for today .. .).

• absolute prohibition to restock with native species or back to the environmental criteria.

• The reforestation must be done through a public company with workers on permanent contracts (not to create another group of interest.)
  

• Control timber imports for the local processing industry. As we worry about the integrity of our forests, we must also take care that our industry does not use wood from illegal logging, often in primary forest (of altítisimo ecological value), to turn it into pulp or cheap furniture. Requirement that all imports meet international standards on sustainable forestry (FSC ), doing business ecological attack in other parts of the globe.

With wood you can do business, good business, but in a regulated and sustainable. With this business we all win, we win more, and not lose the forest.

Birthday Cakes (motorbikes)

Processing Industry Livestock Farmers

Interests:

quickly and cheaply dispose of farm waste and to remove bushes from a farm for plowing and harvesting.

One of the causes of fires on the website of the Ministry emphasis (rather than one to which no apologies) is in the burning of stubble and use of fire to clear farms. Why not be written specialist of it, and perhaps in other regions of Spain is, but it seems too cowardly blame exclusively to the weaker party, while on the same page is exonerated, I do not know which arguments speculators who play with the rezoning.

While it is undeniable that the stubble burning is one of the causes of fire, serves to explain the majority of those that occur away from cultivated areas in several simultaneous outbreaks in the evening. The burning of rubbish, prohibited in the summer and heavily regulated, it is very rare to get out of hand by the interest of the farmer, it would be very easy to determine the origin of the fire.

fires near population centers may also have cause quarrels and vendettas . This may be the only section in which I can not argue that the causes of fire are economic interests. It is also the most difficult to eradicate, because stupidity is inherent in the human species.

Another cause is the most dangerous cleaning vacant bush fire, which can be produced by local people to remove scrub, either for further culture, either to prevent him from taking refuge in aminals, either as pasture.

The idea of \u200b\u200bclean Mount is to consider a mountain live a dirty Mount ; against his idea of \u200b\u200bclean mountain is a mountain in rock, in the process of desertification. This type of fire itself is more dangerous by the uncontrolled, and the proximity to people and farms vulnerable plantations (vineyards, chestnut groves ...).

assessment makes some people in the villages of scrubland as garbage to be cleaned is curiously similar to the solution they provide certain understood and politicians who believe that the burning bush because it is dirty, and that prevention efforts should be directed to remove the understory and in general all of the combustible material. These words may be correct to speak of logging are uppercase stupid if we generalize to the whole mountain, and show the view that these speculators have the mountain nature Galician: all he is a forestry operation to which it can suck every last drop of blood (sap).

This is serious, widespread at precisely this view among politicians responsible for preserving forests:

• Firstly, the understory not garbage or dirt , but an inherent part of the forest with important ecological role as large-sized species and ensuring environmental sustainability. Remove it spaying is a forest, reducing it to the category of culture, an ecosystem anemic, a mere planting of trees is no longer nature.

• Secondly, it is absolutely impossible. whole mount clearing Galician, plus an environmental attack, is impossible because it would require more staff for the Galician population itself. The mountain is too vast unthinkable for which is known only from the black ribbon of asphalt.

• Third, knowing that much of the Galician forest area has been burned and there is bush, that is, mounted on natural regeneration process ... if remove the cover or carqueixas Xestas ... what's left? Bare rocks "? Is that the reasoning of the Ministry for Rural Affairs to suppress the fires?

If the reasoning that " the forest burns because it is dirty " I continue, quite logically end up sharing the opinion of Bush, that burns the forest because there . Talándolo, the problem is over (dead dog

...). Sounds like a nasty misrepresentation blame the forest to burn (because it is dirty, it is dry, because it's sloppy ..). The forest does not burn only, burn the forest because they burn (dry storms cause a zero point something percent fires.) We have to prevent anyone to plant the forest fire, for preventing the burning bush of the genus is stupid: if you mount, burn, and if not burn it or because it has rained, or because there is Mt. Investing in doing even more damage to the mountain Galician seems the height of absurdity and political cowardice.

SOLUTIONS:

• Again: automatic restocking of areas affected by fire.

• Education in rural areas to eliminate the culture of fire, showing the rivers DANGER thereof.

• give facilities to farmers for clearing of fields, including fire, structured manner and with appropriate safety measures (presence of fighting services at the time of fire). Not enough to ban without giving alternatives, because if farmers can not do it in a controlled manner, there is the temptation to do it secretly, with unpredictable effects.

• Education ng of responsible public on ecological values \u200b\u200bof the mountain, not just the money.

• Policies to promote rural as an area of \u200b\u200bnatural and cultural to protect. Why yes, it is our duty as Galicia, but also for reasons of cost effectiveness. Rural tourism not only needs of hotels, also a natural way to offer the visitor as an alternative to the urban environment of the next.

• Compliance European legislation on sustainable forestry. Adoption recognizes distinctive. Out of the illegality and barbarism of the Galician mountains. Farewell to cheap timber. Wood is a limited resource that must be preserved ... and pay. Galicia can not be the subject of cheap wood to the extent of cellulose. The Galician landscape can not decide four companies. We can not turn our land into a pine and eucalyptus trees planted for the benefit of a few.

• clear demarcation of what is a logging , which will seek the maximum profit that respect minimal environmental (which need not be an obstacle, but rather the result of good management of the holding), as distinct from what is natural, with all figures protection necessary to preserve it as unchanged.

Galicia can not be a reserve, but not all can be a Galician forest of pine and eucalyptus cultivation. A mountain full leaves more money to the villagers that the monoculture model and we have sold only one possible.

Manuife Good Investment

Interests:

Creating new pastures areas where you can graze livestock, especially sheep, outbreaks of the vegetation that grows after the fire.

This, at least in this corner of the peninsula, a residual cause of fires. With a declining ranching, focusing increasingly on a cattle and pig stables, I do not have a particular relevance.

Solutions:

• Modernization of farms

• Surveillance in compliance with the law that prohibits grazing animals on field regeneration after fire

Littlest Pet Shop Vip Commercial

Turbine Industry

Interests:

Overcoming administrative concerns for the location of wind farms . A burning bush is not to protect ecological values, and therefore can be built without hindrance or administrative obstacles.

Galicia is a pioneer community in the implementation of wind turbines, which would be good news if not for the way it is developing. With no regulation bureaucratic regulation, but de facto , the wind mills multiply the whim of the companies, parks installing on the ashes of recently burned forests (Xur é s, A Canda ..).

The presence of vegetation makes you lose speed in the lower air friction, and this effect is more pronounced the higher the height of the trees. A forest is thus a problem for wind generation because wind slows and therefore reduces the electricity produced. Furthermore, there is a forest under the wind that makes an impact on the scoop in its lower course has less speed than the one above, introducing a rocking effort, the source of vibrations that make for a premature failure of the rotor fatigue of materials. The temptation is thus very large and very small risk, to clean or clear the area where the wind farm projects with a candle and a bottle of gasoline.

also the inconvenient presence of a forest can hold, given the rarity of an honest public manager, the approval of the environmental study. Readily soluble inconvenience, as we know.

Solutions:

• Again: Prohibit the re of fire-affected forest. Reforestation automatically.

• effective analysis the environmental impact studies , stop being a mere formality that nobody read, and often copy the park before.

• Control in installation of these parks, according to economic criteria, social and ecological, not just corporate interest. Ie that the regional government to take responsibility in the management of forests and not delegate the regulatory role in business.

• A wind farm has to be a force to be burdensome for the mount on which to build. One way to lessen this impact would obligation to allocate part of the park's construction budget to rehabilitate the forest that will serve as a location, returning part of life that will destroy. Thus nature also could benefit from this lucrative business is subsidized electricity generation from wind. Regenerated forest is preferable to wind a barren hill by the fire. The nature and these structures can coexist if they do things right, and so, are the administrations to regulate their construction.

• Production subsidies , not the installation. That is, public support will come regarding energy produced by wind and not installed, so that companies can install only those elements that are cost-effective energy, and seek solutions to increase performance (increased height of the tower and higher power generator), to amortize the cost better, also ecological, which means its implementation. Poorly distributed subsidies distort the market and create technical aberrations (industry whose purpose is to hunt subsidies, not the efficient, as we see so often in the agricultural sector).

Janam Kundali Predictions Online

Hunting

Interests: Convert

mounted in a shooting gallery . What was once forest, bush hirsute now where you can spot and shoot a piece at enormous distances. In an impenetrable forest chances are the animal in the open, the gun.

Solutions:

• enforcement of the law that prohibits hunting in burned forest, but extending the deadline, to allow regeneration of the forest (at least 5 years to scrub, no less than 20 for forest).

• Reforestation automatically. The State's obligation to leave everything as it was before the fire is the best way to desist those who want change.

• awareness, even through the same hunting clubs, the need to preserve nature. Fires in the medium term, also diminishing the population likely to be hunted.

Itouch Earphones 2009

extinction Requalifications

If all the entries I have very clear that only a few people from designated groups may be responsible, without criminalizing the group in general is in this section which is more relevant for respect and admiration I feel for those who play the skin from fighting fires. To say that all crew members burned the forest is more than unfair: it is absurd. But to deny that there are between them responsible is also false: there are sentences in this regard.

Interests:

Securing a job or turnover.

suspicions and complaints usually fall on the ground fighting personnel on the Curritos, usually under precarious contracts that depend on the will of the chief on duty. Wanting to make a few months working in a land where youth unemployment is high, may be the reason more of a fire.

Another reason for revenge among former workers who have been hired for next season. The timing and lack of expertise are obvious causes for fires.

unfair to blame But I think the only draw a meager salary of fires, when the forest fire is a lucrative business moving large lots of money and technical resources (which seems to take pride rather than shame the Regional Minister shift). The escalating number of fires and investimentos against lume van suspiciously or couples.

The danger is that it has created from the political stupidity a vicious circle, and remove the chain of interest is no easy task as it would be suicidal coup without most effective anti-fire. Members

gangs, but also rental companies machinery, and it goes without saying cargo aircraft on the ground, seaplanes and helicopters Xunta the rent each year. How much does each trip of a seaplane? How much time heavy equipment? If a year, by divine miracle, would not fire ... what these companies would live? The existence of fire in a season for these companies is the difference between obtain huge profits and ruin.

would be interesting if the Xunta also advertised these costs, as well as which companies each item is addressed.

A curious fact, I remember seeing more than 10 major stops bulldozers in a huge fire, without even download them from the shelves because the topography did not allow its use. Who sent them there? Who is responsible for such a wasteful expenditure?

means no shortage, lack of ideas.

Solutions: Personal

• extinguishing permanent contracts unrelated to the existence of fire . Outside of fire season This staff is dedicated to afforestation, improvement of firebreaks and other preventive forestry work.

• Clean and transparency in the selection staff, under the regional government, not the corrupt city.

• La Xunta is must provide own extinguishing media, to discourage the rental of machinery's interest to burn the forest.

• Provide media training and the crews. An example: There is little point a truck bomb expensive if you do not have adequate maps (2 €) and knowledge to interpret (the staff of the watchtowers is given a photocopy of a road map scale 1:300,000).

• r begin a process of investment in education firefighting , dedicating them to the comprehensive regeneration of forests.

• 

Masterbation In The Shower Por

Interests:

Change by the fire land uses, by failing to protect the ecosystem as it is reduced to ashes, eliminating the reluctance of councilors modesty. Thus we see the rise after a fire estates, farms agricultural, industrial or wind farms. These lands

unlocked and multiply their value, and are also a juicy business for speculators and temptation for corruption policy. Force by converting land fire is a tradition on the Mediterranean coast in the Atlantic have imported. When a tree bother to build anything, the solution is removed by the flame.

Solutions:

• Again: automatic restocking. Where there was a forest, you have again.

• enforcement of the law that prevents the rezoning of land affected by the fire for five decades, with no loopholes through which to strain the political and judicial corruption.

Denis Milani Mega Vedio

In rural

often attribute the causes of fires to political reasons. This thesis was put forward by some members and officials of the PP in Galicia, in explicit or veiled reference to the youth of the BNG.

Before the recent political shift also some argue that Villagers are more conservative right who burn the forest as a revenge or vengeance policy.

Both claims, without evidence, without any foundation and are simple slander. Could be the specific case of a madman, but do not consider that be the explanation for the wave of fires that burned for years the site northwest of the Iberian Peninsula, in regions and periods of very different political circumstances. Yes, there

political reasons behind the fires, but not in a manner so gross. This summer, with the recent change of political sign in the government of the Xunta coincided with the worst fire season in the history of Galician forest does not seem to happen.

But the reason must be sought more in return for economic interests outlined above, the names of offices, recruitment policies (let's use this year and I have everything signed, because the next year and my friend is not in such a position and whether there will be business.) It's more a rush of economic causes a political reason itself.

policy also cause fires and neglect the absolute stupidity that has been managed in recent decades the mountain. Best said, has not managed anything, just left in the hands of stakeholders management and exploitation of the forest. Anarchy in the sense of barbarism, savagery and lawlessness , the absence of effective control (only much paperwork). This is the great cause of the fire: the political inaction , fearing to disturb or harm certain sectors or powerful interests, rather powerful interests, as the general interest in Galicia in full is biologically superior.

Solutions:

• Again: managing the forest as a sustainable forestry well organizations, which benefits the whole interpolation: groundwater recharge, flood protection and runoff repopulating the headwaters of rivers, CO2 sinks for meeting the Kyoto objectives, teaching and recreation, biodiversity reserve ... and especially the rural dwellers: ecotourism, mushroom picking, soil conservation, pasture grass, pruning fuel, etc.
  

Milena Velba Dvd Bikes & Bras

Policy accidental or incidental

Sparks vehicles, dry storms, cigarette butts, barbecues, glass, fireworks ... etc. That is, those fires by random or negligence .

These causes, some truly outlandish, seem to be for politicians and the media offered the only explanation. A negligent fires, the vast majority in Galicia, the most serious, they were never even identifies a hypothetical subject.

As the source of this page is not a good impression on anyone, but think about the causation of the fire, I will not dwell more on it. Apologize for pilgrims and bizarre ideas, you will find many in the institutional sites of ministries, Regional Ministry and government agencies. Maybe in other

land may have some statistical rigor such casualties, but in the Northwest, we know that children's fables to divert attention: some burning year after year the forest and no administration wants to get wet and attack the causes, not to offend any sector. So, are limited to spending public money in putting out fires instead of tackling the problem at its root and prosecute those responsible.

Some say it is the work of insane. The arson is a thankfully rare mental disorder. It is necessary to distinguish between the arsonist (mentally ill who delights in the fire) and the incendiary , person that set fire to the mountain waiting for some benefit.

attributed the wave of fires that Galicia suffers arson is as absurd as attributing to the hooligans: no more crazy in Galicia than in other regions of the peninsula and yes, on the contrary, there are more fires. The types of fires actions speak fire professionals, not unbalanced or childish.

Post Viral Fatiguereflux

In recent decades, the construction of the Galician landscape has been decided by two interest groups: on the one hand, the hunters and farmers, burning forests and leaving a low scrub forest with suitable to their interests. On the other hand, the pulp industry, forcing the state to restock with short rotation species.

Thus, the Atlantic forest has suffered an extraordinary decline, now being the exception among monocultures of P inus Radiata and Eucalyptus globulus and large tracts of barren hill and Penedos ( half the province of Ourense). The Galicia

barbaric the last century, forest modeling has been carried out by some interest groups, with the acquiescence of the government. The only thing that has been limited in recent years Xunta is extinguish fires that were emerging, without addressing the root causes. You could do worse: the exponential increase lume investimentos against or has created a real business around the fire, a new interest group will be very difficult to disable.

The group of citizens has stolen the power to decide which model we want for our land mount. The administration has ignored the problem and let them do (laissez faire ) as ultra-liberal doctrine, if not participated in the robbery and acted in the service of companies.

of Galicia Galicia is and should be the ones to decide what Galicia want for themselves and for their children:

- A model of forest that only benefits a few, imposed since the Franco dictatorship to the present democratic days, as opposed to biodiversity and a comprehensive forestry service use of the rural people. A Galicia pine, eucalyptus and glades.

- Or a Galicia with a sustainable forestry native species of high economic value, not cheap wood intended for grinding. A preserved natural environment bring benefits to the very impoverished rural areas, so they could benefit from forest que hasta la dictadura fueron suyos y les fueron enajenados a mayor gloria y beneficio de las empresas transformadoras. Desde el turismo a la recolección de setas, nueces, castañas... vemos que un bosque íntegro es una riqueza para las regiones que lo mantienen (Asturias, Segovia, Bretaña, Vosgos ...). Un bosque esquilmado, atrofiado, quemado, trae consigo pobreza, infertilidad, destrucción del paisaje, emigración, abandono....

El paisaje gallego está en construcción, mejor dicho, en destrucción . Sobre el lienzo que sostienen las madereras, pintan los cazadores con la paleta de colores que han escogido las celulosas, los de las brigadas le dan los retoques end and decide where to put Xesta green or black carbon. Meanwhile, the government covered the work and nod vaguely. People only see fabric scraps from the car window, and passes to them among indifferent and resigned.

Galicia Others are drawing in which our children will live. What if we took us dibujasemos brushes and we want? What if Galicia out again that was before Attila and his barbarian hordes ruin this land?

Stop dreaming and let's get to work.