Interests:
quickly and cheaply dispose of farm waste and to remove bushes from a farm for plowing and harvesting.
One of the causes of fires on the website of the Ministry emphasis (rather than one to which no apologies) is in the burning of stubble and use of fire to clear farms. Why not be written specialist of it, and perhaps in other regions of Spain is, but it seems too cowardly blame exclusively to the weaker party, while on the same page is exonerated, I do not know which arguments speculators who play with the rezoning.
While it is undeniable that the stubble burning is one of the causes of fire, serves to explain the majority of those that occur away from cultivated areas in several simultaneous outbreaks in the evening. The burning of rubbish, prohibited in the summer and heavily regulated, it is very rare to get out of hand by the interest of the farmer, it would be very easy to determine the origin of the fire.
fires near population centers may also have cause quarrels and vendettas . This may be the only section in which I can not argue that the causes of fire are economic interests. It is also the most difficult to eradicate, because stupidity is inherent in the human species.
Another cause is the most dangerous cleaning vacant bush fire, which can be produced by local people to remove scrub, either for further culture, either to prevent him from taking refuge in aminals, either as pasture.
The idea of \u200b\u200bclean Mount is to consider a mountain live a dirty Mount ; against his idea of \u200b\u200bclean mountain is a mountain in rock, in the process of desertification. This type of fire itself is more dangerous by the uncontrolled, and the proximity to people and farms vulnerable plantations (vineyards, chestnut groves ...).
assessment makes some people in the villages of scrubland as garbage to be cleaned is curiously similar to the solution they provide certain understood and politicians who believe that the burning bush because it is dirty, and that prevention efforts should be directed to remove the understory and in general all of the combustible material. These words may be correct to speak of logging are uppercase stupid if we generalize to the whole mountain, and show the view that these speculators have the mountain nature Galician: all he is a forestry operation to which it can suck every last drop of blood (sap).
This is serious, widespread at precisely this view among politicians responsible for preserving forests:
-
Firstly, the understory not garbage or dirt , but an inherent part of the forest with important ecological role as large-sized species and ensuring environmental sustainability. Remove it spaying is a forest, reducing it to the category of culture, an ecosystem anemic, a mere planting of trees is no longer nature.
-
Secondly, it is absolutely impossible. whole mount clearing Galician, plus an environmental attack, is impossible because it would require more staff for the Galician population itself. The mountain is too vast unthinkable for which is known only from the black ribbon of asphalt.
-
Third, knowing that much of the Galician forest area has been burned and there is bush, that is, mounted on natural regeneration process ... if remove the cover or carqueixas Xestas ... what's left? Bare rocks "? Is that the reasoning of the Ministry for Rural Affairs to suppress the fires?
If the reasoning that " the forest burns because it is dirty " I continue, quite logically end up sharing the opinion of Bush, that burns the forest because there . Talándolo, the problem is over (dead dog
...). Sounds like a nasty misrepresentation blame the forest to burn (because it is dirty, it is dry, because it's sloppy ..). The forest does not burn only, burn the forest because they burn (dry storms cause a zero point something percent fires.) We have to prevent anyone to plant the forest fire, for preventing the burning bush of the genus is stupid: if you mount, burn, and if not burn it or because it has rained, or because there is Mt. Investing in doing even more damage to the mountain Galician seems the height of absurdity and political cowardice.
-
Again: automatic restocking of areas affected by fire.
-
Education in rural areas to eliminate the culture of fire, showing the rivers DANGER thereof.
-
give facilities to farmers for clearing of fields, including fire, structured manner and with appropriate safety measures (presence of fighting services at the time of fire). Not enough to ban without giving alternatives, because if farmers can not do it in a controlled manner, there is the temptation to do it secretly, with unpredictable effects.
-
Education ng of responsible public on ecological values \u200b\u200bof the mountain, not just the money.
-
Policies to promote rural as an area of \u200b\u200bnatural and cultural to protect. Why yes, it is our duty as Galicia, but also for reasons of cost effectiveness. Rural tourism not only needs of hotels, also a natural way to offer the visitor as an alternative to the urban environment of the next.
-
Compliance European legislation on sustainable forestry. Adoption recognizes distinctive. Out of the illegality and barbarism of the Galician mountains. Farewell to cheap timber. Wood is a limited resource that must be preserved ... and pay. Galicia can not be the subject of cheap wood to the extent of cellulose. The Galician landscape can not decide four companies. We can not turn our land into a pine and eucalyptus trees planted for the benefit of a few.
-
clear demarcation of what is a logging , which will seek the maximum profit that respect minimal environmental (which need not be an obstacle, but rather the result of good management of the holding), as distinct from what is natural, with all figures protection necessary to preserve it as unchanged.
Galicia can not be a reserve, but not all can be a Galician forest of pine and eucalyptus cultivation. A mountain full leaves more money to the villagers that the monoculture model and we have sold only one possible.
0 comments:
Post a Comment