You think that the attractiveness of the western has to decrease at some point, after seeing nearly all Ford, something has to start to disappear. And it is not, from among the tangle of people through biblical rivers to reach the promised land or, in other words, to be saved from their sins, appears Bend of the River of Mann.
In Bend of the River, there are two stories: one, the protagonist (James Stewart) and another, one of the side, Jeremy Ball. He hires Stewart to guide a hundred people to a new settlement across mountains, rivers, etc., In this new site, Dance is to build a city in western ideal, morally equal and that is not tainted by the scourge of gold, alcohol, excessive greed in general.
course, arise along the way Stewart thousand conflicts and resolves all the shots, killing over twenty people. Stewart's story is revealed little by little but it is evident from their eyes and from how we look at the other, that his past is completely dark and bloody.
The first story, that of Stewart, is structured on something that tells Dance on one of the few who really know their past: "Men are like apples: It is better because the bad apple rots the rest." Obviously, Dance unknown past Stewart and the first story focuses on how Stewart shows you your mistake, that men like him, who were considered bad apples, can be changed and passed on the good side, the happy ending is coming from a almost ridiculous, and you seem to get is a little angry with this hero so happy to be accepted in the ideal society.
The second story, the Prom, is structured on the same idea but added another phrase that will loose Cole, the only one who knew Stewart's past, "to help all those who would give you a kick in the ass just know your past? "If you see the movie seriously, in fact, Stewart is still the same instinctive murderer, the same bloodthirsty of his hidden past but with a difference, of course, no less: Now is the side of good; Now kill the bad guys, where the ill-is increasingly relative. Whether it's three against one, no matter who does not have a firearm, no matter at night, Stewart always finds a way to kill those who persecute you. Is it a useful murderer, then? Is how an army? Well, it seems but what matters is Dance.
As you can imagine, knowing the last dance ends and telling Cole: "Oh, you were right, the bad guys can change" and taking all the happy ending. But who changed there? Did Stewart or changed dance?
The hypothesis of this blog is that changes is Dance: Initially, we see almost patriarchal role, knowing the risks but not actively participating in their solutions, ultimately delivering the same dance ends corchazos right and sinister lesser extent than Stewart but there are several that fall hit by their fire. If dance was changed, if realized now dance to be filled the hands of blood for the ideal city to prosper, it really changed his mind about the bad guys are always going to be bad? Or, perhaps, that dance is now a rotten apple over the box, reached by what Stewart contaminant that can not distinguish between their own turn bad and become good outside of Stewart. Or is that dance has to clear his own conscience justified in forgetting offered absolution and Stewart?
Whatever the correct answer, the irony lies in the fact Mann mere possibility of these readings, that happy ending which you complain is indeed the beginning of a society in which there is no one, but two bad apples.
(*) pic from here
In Bend of the River, there are two stories: one, the protagonist (James Stewart) and another, one of the side, Jeremy Ball. He hires Stewart to guide a hundred people to a new settlement across mountains, rivers, etc., In this new site, Dance is to build a city in western ideal, morally equal and that is not tainted by the scourge of gold, alcohol, excessive greed in general.
course, arise along the way Stewart thousand conflicts and resolves all the shots, killing over twenty people. Stewart's story is revealed little by little but it is evident from their eyes and from how we look at the other, that his past is completely dark and bloody.
The first story, that of Stewart, is structured on something that tells Dance on one of the few who really know their past: "Men are like apples: It is better because the bad apple rots the rest." Obviously, Dance unknown past Stewart and the first story focuses on how Stewart shows you your mistake, that men like him, who were considered bad apples, can be changed and passed on the good side, the happy ending is coming from a almost ridiculous, and you seem to get is a little angry with this hero so happy to be accepted in the ideal society.
The second story, the Prom, is structured on the same idea but added another phrase that will loose Cole, the only one who knew Stewart's past, "to help all those who would give you a kick in the ass just know your past? "If you see the movie seriously, in fact, Stewart is still the same instinctive murderer, the same bloodthirsty of his hidden past but with a difference, of course, no less: Now is the side of good; Now kill the bad guys, where the ill-is increasingly relative. Whether it's three against one, no matter who does not have a firearm, no matter at night, Stewart always finds a way to kill those who persecute you. Is it a useful murderer, then? Is how an army? Well, it seems but what matters is Dance.
As you can imagine, knowing the last dance ends and telling Cole: "Oh, you were right, the bad guys can change" and taking all the happy ending. But who changed there? Did Stewart or changed dance?
The hypothesis of this blog is that changes is Dance: Initially, we see almost patriarchal role, knowing the risks but not actively participating in their solutions, ultimately delivering the same dance ends corchazos right and sinister lesser extent than Stewart but there are several that fall hit by their fire. If dance was changed, if realized now dance to be filled the hands of blood for the ideal city to prosper, it really changed his mind about the bad guys are always going to be bad? Or, perhaps, that dance is now a rotten apple over the box, reached by what Stewart contaminant that can not distinguish between their own turn bad and become good outside of Stewart. Or is that dance has to clear his own conscience justified in forgetting offered absolution and Stewart?
Whatever the correct answer, the irony lies in the fact Mann mere possibility of these readings, that happy ending which you complain is indeed the beginning of a society in which there is no one, but two bad apples.
(*) pic from here
0 comments:
Post a Comment